Is There a Safer Alternative to Power Plants?

This is a thesis proposal I wrote for my communications class, I thought I would share it. I proposed the idea of safer and cleaner energy.

Mercury can cause severe nervous system problems in humans and wildlife, and it is only one of the few deadly chemicals released by coal-fired power plants.  Currently, in the United States there are over six hundred coal-fired power plants, and they provide over fifty percent of our electricity nationwide.  The United States should use an alternative source of energy for their coal power plants, with a free and clean energy source, such as, solar or wind energy.  One of the major reasons to terminate coal-fired power plants is it’s negative impact on human life. In addition, the cost of coal and the cost of building coal fired-power plants are already steadily increasing.  Finally, coal is a limited resource and can’t be relied on for the future.

To begin with, toxins released into the air through coal-fired power plants have a negative impact on human health.  Asthma attacks, cardiac problems, respiratory problems, and premature deaths are a result from fine particles released into the air by coal-fired power plants.  John Balbus, the chief health scientist at the Environmental Defense Fund states “we estimate that between roughly 6000 and 10,700 annual deaths from heart ailments, respiratory disease and lung cancer can be attributed to the 88 coal-fired power plants and companies receiving public international financing”(Balbus).  Studies have shown that “people dying prematurely from problems associated with exposure to fine particle pollution lost an average of fourteen years, and pollution from burning coal is responsible for 38,200 nonfatal heart attacks and 554,000 asthma attacks each year.  Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Florida had the highest overall mortality rates each year, and West Virginia, Kentucky, and Tennessee, states with a large number of coal-fired plants, had the highest mortality risk“(Schneider).  Fly ash emitted by coal-fired power plants carries one hundred times more radiation than a nuclear power plant producing the same amount of energy.  Mercury, selenium, lead, and coal ash are byproducts of these power plants’ that cause air and water pollution.  Coal fired power plants are the biggest source of mercury pollution. “A survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published in early 2003 found that one in twelve (eight percent) American women of childbearing age had mercury in their blood above the levels considered safe by the Environmental Protection Agency”(Northeast 5).  Mercury levels that high can cause neurological damage in newborns, and adverse cardiovascular effects in adults.  The effects of mercury from coal-fired power plants has an impact in the fish we consume, NESCAUM (Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management) states that “the release of mercury to the environment contaminates fresh and saltwater fisheries to such an extent that forty-five states and one U.S. territory have issued advisories warning of the dangers of eating fish with elevated concentrations of mercury“.  Aside from the adverse effects on human health, the cost of coal and the cost of building coal fired-power plants are already steadily increasing.

6
Liked it
8 Responses to “Is There a Safer Alternative to Power Plants?”
  1. Erin Miller Says...

    On December 19, 2010 at 2:00 am

    Your sources are listed greatly and this is a well written thesis. I congratulate you! Oh and welcome to Triond.


  2. lowellhenderson Says...

    On December 19, 2010 at 8:31 am

    Great article. If you have time to look through some of my work you will find that I am a big fan of solar energy. I build solar pannels as a hobby and am an asthma sufferer so articles like your I appreciate very much.


  3. TaylermnHill Says...

    On December 19, 2010 at 12:01 pm

    good post and well written. Keep up the good work and welcome to triond.


  4. albert1jemi Says...

    On December 20, 2010 at 4:32 pm

    great post


  5. Nina Mason Says...

    On December 22, 2010 at 3:21 pm

    Great article! I hope you received a good mark on your thesis.
    It is disgusting what we have to live with and breathe each day.
    In Hamilton Ontario, Canada a few years ago, a coal plant was shut down and 4 stacks were destroyed. It was wonderful to see them go down and removed from our beautiful earth.


  6. Geny Says...

    On December 28, 2010 at 10:50 am

    Thanks for sharing


  7. DemonDogZack Says...

    On January 14, 2011 at 11:58 pm

    Wow is the government really this stupid or are they trying to kill us all? Also, will be finding ways to use these elements to help the world have less pollution and mercury might actually create life on Mars.


  8. AWritingSighting Says...

    On February 2, 2011 at 12:13 am

    In Texas, New Mexico, and California I have seen the wind turbine “farms” where one sees acre after acre of these very tall, white with 3 fan blade turbines. I have heard there is a limitation on how much power they can actually contribute.
    Wish I was still a student…I would double down here too! Well written thesis.


Post Comment
comments powered by Disqus