Difference Between Rutherford’s Model and Bohr’s Model

A brief article on the difference of the atomic models made by Ernest Rutherford and Niels Bohr.

Rutherford describes the atom as a tiny, dense, positively charged core called a nucleus, in which nearly all the mass is concentrated. He confirmed the existence of proton. He pictured in his model that electrons are in motion around the nucleus. According to Rutherford’s model, electrons may move anywhere within the volume of space around the nucleus. This concept contradicts with the atomic model that was later proposed by Niels Bohr. Bohr made restrictions to the movement of electrons by imposing pictures of electrons in an orbit around the nucleus. In his theory, he used the quantum rule which was introduced by Max Planck.

According to Rutherford’s model, the electrostatic attraction between electrons and the nucleus was likened to the gravitational force of attraction which implied the structure of a solar system. This gave Rutherford an implication of scattered electrons around the nucleus which is called electron clouds. However, Bohr gave Rutherford’s atomic model a shell structure in which electrons corresponds to specific orbits with a discrete energy level. He concluded that an atom has specific, allowable energy levels called stationary states in which electrons occupy a fixed circular orbit around the nucleus. He fixed and approximately located presence of electrons in orbital surrounding a nucleus by using quantum mechanics principles.

Rutherford’s Model

Image Source

Bohr’s Model

Image Source

19
Liked it
21 Responses to “Difference Between Rutherford’s Model and Bohr’s Model”
  1. cardy Says...

    On February 28, 2009 at 5:59 am

    You have a brilliant mind.


  2. macon Says...

    On February 28, 2009 at 6:42 am

    nice article. very informative. but even science evolves. definitions and theories will soon be much deeper or even proven.


  3. Tusaani Says...

    On February 28, 2009 at 7:50 am

    Great point which was well-summarized.


  4. Joshua Miguel Says...

    On February 28, 2009 at 8:04 am

    Wow! this is heavy… lol


  5. Darla Smith Says...

    On February 28, 2009 at 9:12 am

    Great article!


  6. nesita Says...

    On February 28, 2009 at 10:45 am

    This is way over my head but a well research article.


  7. Blade619 Says...

    On February 28, 2009 at 10:57 am

    It’s geeky… I like it!


  8. Mr Ghaz Says...

    On March 1, 2009 at 1:05 am

    Bravo! Thats cool mate. Very informative article abt atom. Nicely done and thanks for sharing


  9. Mermush Says...

    On March 5, 2009 at 2:01 am

    ok you seriously tlked bout rutherford and bohr!! wow!! i thot yu were kiddin….
    reminded me of my school days strugglin wid stupid physics…some serious deja vu happenin here!!!


  10. ASCsoon Says...

    On August 26, 2009 at 8:34 am

    WOW!! thanks..this is a great help in my homework!!..you are really cool..Thanks a lot really!!


  11. Prithwish Says...

    On May 29, 2010 at 5:31 am

    Very scientific and useful article. It is the best among all the articles. THANKSSSS


  12. kavya Says...

    On June 7, 2010 at 11:06 am

    u did not provide proper details….


  13. Sarah Says...

    On September 21, 2010 at 5:57 pm

    thx man u helped me out ALOT


  14. N. Sun Says...

    On September 26, 2010 at 5:55 pm

    Great article!


  15. Jasmine Says...

    On October 4, 2010 at 9:41 pm

    Thanks! This article helped me with my chemistry homework!


  16. heena Says...

    On October 24, 2010 at 3:44 am

    nice and brief differences are given. thanx.


  17. adhkgafkrwgi Says...

    On January 25, 2011 at 12:03 am

    Dude helped me with my chemistry homework a lot might want to include how Bohr and Rutherford found these differences


  18. Cody Auer Says...

    On April 26, 2011 at 2:23 pm

    Thank you for the confusing article….


  19. Cody Auer Says...

    On April 26, 2011 at 2:24 pm

    Thank you for the confusing article


  20. Mahvish Says...

    On November 23, 2011 at 6:54 am

    strange point.orbits in my book are mentioned in rutherford model as well.so its a similarity rather than a difference


  21. Philly Muwaya Says...

    On September 1, 2012 at 3:58 pm

    Its great though so detailed……….


Post Comment
comments powered by Disqus