My Thoughts on “ardi “

Evolutionists celebrated the discovery of Ardi, as they often do, they’ve made assumptions and jumped to conclusions. This article is to encourage people to use their God-given enquiring minds and basic common sense to Think Critically about "Evolution".

Evolutionists celebrated the discovery of “Ardi” and went on to claim that Ardi was related to humans. I find that laughable and let me explain why, they ASSUME common ancestry first of all, secondly all that was found was (See Below)

What IS a fact is that the bones exist, but you cannot tell if a fossil had any descendants, it’s dead. If I were to take bones into a court of law and say “this is the ancestor of -insert animal here-” I’d either be laughed from the courtroom or asked “how do you know this particular fossil is the ancestor of anything?”

Evolutionists are good at using artistic renderings to convince people to believe their assumptions. For example, in the case of Ardi, they came up with the artists rendering below of what they THINK Ardi looked like.

At this point I’d like to remind my readers that speculation,and impressive artistic renderings, are not science. Evolutionists are constantly using artistic renderings to try to force their assumptions and presuppositions into the fact column. Even though an assumption and speculation is NOT a fact.

Evolutionists say things such as

“The seven stone, four-foot tall female roamed forests 4.4 million years ago – a million years before the previous oldest discovered fossil.”

What they never bother telling people is that dating methods are faulty and that they are ASSUMING what they say is true. Dear readers I suggest you ask questions, use those enquiring minds. In reality all we know about Ardi is that the bones exist, do not let evolutionists presuppositions and assumptions confuse and decieve you.

Think Critically,

God Bless.

  

4
Liked it

14 Responses to “My Thoughts on “ardi “”

  1. Karen Gross Says...

    On October 1, 2009 at 7:06 pm

    Yes, scientific assumptions are often based on nothing more than a single tooth, or the wrong skull for a skeleton. We cannot just say that because something is in a textbook or in a journal that it is true.


  2. Mark Says...

    On October 1, 2009 at 11:21 pm

    Contrary to popular belief, reality is that evolution is not scientific…it’s a secular belief system nothing more, Darwin wasn’t even a scientist. I read in an article “before lucy there was ardi” but what the evolutionists fail to mention is that “Lucy” was shown to be a fraud, evolutionists, when will you let the Darwinian Delusion go? It’s a fairy-tale for adults,

    Darwin was 1. a liar, 2. A heretic and apostate.


  3. Dear All Says...

    On October 1, 2009 at 11:34 pm

    Remember we were warned Apostates and false teachers like Darwin would come,Darwinian teachers have deceived many, but we would do well to heed the scriptures warning.

    2 Thessalonians 2:3

    “Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;”

    Dear All, if you believe in evolution, I plead with you to use your minds and open your eyes, Evolution is false.


  4. maranatha Says...

    On October 2, 2009 at 1:12 am

    I wouldn’t go so far as to say Darwin lied…. I think he believed what he was saying. He was just wrong, and wrote as much later in life.

    Your article is well done, and thank you for it. As far as critical thinking goes – that is a learned science as well, is it not?


  5. jamie mullen Says...

    On October 2, 2009 at 7:50 am

    Mark I feel that for the good of you’re own soul I have to tell you that you are also a heretic as is Dear all and everyone else who dares translate the bible into english. Anyone who does so will suffer eternal damnation. Deus caritas est.


  6. Mark Says...

    On October 2, 2009 at 7:59 am

    Jamie,

    translating the Bible into English is not heresy, whoever told you it was?


  7. Robert Says...

    On October 2, 2009 at 8:09 am

    The Bible has been translated into many languages, translating is not heresy, and whoever claimed it was is misguided.The scriptures are meant to be understood by people of ALL languages and cultures, therefore translation is NECESSARY.


  8. jamie mullen Says...

    On October 2, 2009 at 8:58 am

    Clearly someone is not familiar with history. In the 1500’s people were burned at the stake for translating the bible into a language that was not latin it was one of the issues that brought on the reformation. And because Christianity brings OBJECTIVE TRUTH something that is once a heresy is allways a heresy. It was only the forces of godless skepticism that changed that. We now live in a hellbound secular world so I assume you will not be burned at the stake but you will burn in hell. Deus caritas est.


  9. Robert Says...

    On October 2, 2009 at 9:15 am

    The catholics burned people at the stake,Catholics are not Christian,You ask why I say that?

    Here’s Why,the actual fact is they burned anyone that disagreed with the Pope or Catholic Church. Catholicism twisted the Faith, they abused it, Catholics (the pope included) were about conquest, not about Christian good will. Further, Catholics do things even today that are unbiblical in nature.

    I remember you had an issue when that was mentioned before, but it’s still true. The Catholic church’s history is bathed in the blood of martyrs.


  10. P.S. from Robert Says...

    On October 2, 2009 at 9:26 am

    The Catholic Church ARE guilty themselves of Heresy, but translating the Bible into a language other than Latin is NOT heretical, the ORIGINAL TEXTS weren’t even in Latin.

    The catholic church is based on human tradition, not the Bible.

    Care to have a look at all of TRCC’s heresies and manmade traditions? http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Roman%20Catholicism/catholic_heresies-a_list.htm


  11. Final Comment from Robert Says...

    On October 2, 2009 at 9:48 am

    I thought you might like to know,The Latin language, as the language of prayer and worship in churches, was also imposed by Pope Gregory I. 600 years AFTER Christ, it was NOT imposed by Christ.

    In fact, The Word of God forbids praying and teaching in an unknown tongue. The scriptures, as stated were meant to be easily understood by ALL cultures and tongues.

    (1st Corinthians 14:9). “So likewise ye, except ye utter by the tongue words easy to be understood, how shall it be known what is spoken? for ye shall speak into the air. “


  12. Mark Says...

    On October 2, 2009 at 10:39 am

    In the 1500’s people were burned at the stake for translating the bible into a language that was not latin but what Jamie failed to mention is that it was solely The catholic church burning people. Nowhere does scripture say that the Bible has to be in Latin,Jesus never said ANYTHING about the scriptures having to be in Latin,and I will reiterate…. The Bible doesn’t either ! Therefore I will reiterate once more, translating the scriptures into English, is NOT heresy. Dear Jamie, I base my life on what God and the Bible says, not on what the Pope or Catholic church says, Catholicism as was stated is themselves guilty of Heresy. Jesus told us to Love people and share the gospel, not to use violence (the catholic church and papacy are in deliberate and direct violation of the Lord’s directive.)


  13. Dear All Says...

    On October 2, 2009 at 6:58 pm

    I have friends that are Catholic,most of them are not aware of the history and heresies of the catholic church, many of them were raised catholic,I have nothing against the people, but it is true that the Catholic church as an institution has warped and twisted the faith.

    As for the average everyday Catholic, All we can do is reach out to them with what THE BIBLE says.


  14. fj foster Says...

    On October 22, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    I\’m getting into this a little late, but would like to add that, along with the artists\’ renderings, Ardi comes complete with her own just-so stories. That\’s in keeping with all the other \”missing links\” and \”human ancestors\” we\’ve been treated to – in recent years, at the rate of about one every year or two. Some of those stories are creative enough to make us wonder if the researchers who cook them up are just a bunch of frustrated writers without the nerve to write that novel they\’ve always dreamed of. If they\’d just do that, at least it would be more honest. After all, people know novels are fiction, as opposed to the wild tales they\’re told by evolutionists, who insist on trying to pass their concoctions off as \”science.\”


Post Comment